David French on JD Vance

Senator JD Vance's recent vice presidential debate performance has been characterized by critics as a disingenuous attempt to rebrand himself away from his controversial past as a staunch supporter of Donald Trump. Many observers noted that while he presented a seemingly more moderate persona, he failed to directly address critical questions regarding the legitimacy of the 2020 election, particularly when asked if Trump lost. His evasive response, which included a shift to unrelated topics, was labeled a 'damning non-answer' by his opponent, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. Analysts argue that Vance's ability to avoid direct criticism of Trump's election denialism during the debate could have significant implications for his candidacy. Despite his polished facade, some commentators suggest that Vance is a Machiavellian figure reminiscent of Shakespeare's Iago, driven by self-interest and manipulation. The debate atmosphere contrasted sharply with the previous contentious exchanges involving Trump and Harris, highlighting a tactical shift in GOP strategies as they navigate the election landscape.