The recent debate featuring Vice President Kamala Harris has sparked varied reactions, with some analysts suggesting she failed to provide clear policy proposals, particularly on economic issues, which could alienate undecided voters. While a Reuters survey indicated that six out of ten undecided voters shifted towards Trump after the debate, political analysts initially favored Harris for her combative approach. Critics argue that her performance was marked by vague responses and a lack of substantive policy discussion, which could deepen voter skepticism about her capabilities. Conversely, some reports claim Harris excelled in handling Trump, prompting conspiracy theories about her use of electronic aids during the debate. Amidst the debate fallout, financial analyst Jim Rickards warned of potential market chaos stemming from the current administration's policies. Overall, the debate's impact on voter sentiment remains uncertain, highlighting the complexities of this election cycle.