Closing Arguments End in Menendez Bribery Trial

Closing arguments have concluded in the federal corruption trial of Sen. Bob Menendez, with his defense attorney, Adam Fee, urging jurors to acquit the New Jersey Democrat, arguing that prosecutors failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Menendez, along with businessmen Fred Daibes and Wael Hana, is accused of accepting bribes, including gold bars, cash, and a Mercedes Benz, in exchange for using his political influence to benefit their interests and advance Egyptian military interests. Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Monteleoni emphasized the alleged 'pattern of corruption' and presented evidence, including text messages and search history, to demonstrate Menendez's awareness and involvement in the scheme. Fee countered, arguing the prosecution's case was built on inferences and lacked direct evidence of a quid pro quo. The jury is expected to begin deliberations soon, with Menendez maintaining his innocence and asserting that his actions were lawful and in service of his constituents.