As the election approaches, presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are emphasizing contrasting economic proposals that could significantly impact voters. Trump aims to extend his 2017 tax cuts, proposing further reductions in corporate taxes and eliminating taxes on tips and Social Security income, but critics argue that these plans disproportionately favor wealthy individuals, potentially adding $5.8 trillion to the federal deficit. In contrast, Harris advocates for increased tax benefits for families, including a new childcare tax credit and a proposal to build 3 million homes, with a focus on taxing higher incomes to fund these initiatives, projected to add around $2 trillion to the deficit. Both candidates are addressing key voter concerns around the economy, with Trump proposing tariffs to protect U.S. manufacturing and Harris focusing on affordability measures for the middle class. Analysts note that the differing philosophies behind their plans reflect broader debates over economic growth strategies, with Harris's policies aimed at supporting low-income families while Trump’s lean towards tax cuts for all income brackets. The implications of these proposals could shape the financial landscape for millions of Americans, depending on who wins the presidency.