Former President Donald Trump has stirred debate among Republicans by proposing federally funded in vitro fertilization (IVF) if elected, aiming to address declining birth rates in the U.S. While some GOP leaders, like Senators Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton, express cautious support for IVF, they prefer alternatives such as tax credits over direct funding, revealing divisions within the party. This proposal comes amid a backdrop of resistance from pro-life conservatives who view certain IVF practices as morally problematic, particularly the creation of excess embryos. Furthermore, Trump's stance appears at odds with some Republican ideologies, notably those of his running mate, JD Vance, who has faced backlash for disparaging childless individuals. Critics argue that Trump's IVF plan may be more of a political tactic to attract female voters rather than a genuine policy initiative. As the birth rate continues to decline, the broader implications of these discussions touch on economic and cultural concerns for the Republican party and U.S. society.