Over 900 Former DOJ Attorneys Rebuke Trump Court Nominee Bove

A memo obtained by The Federalist reveals that Washington, D.C. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg and several fellow judges expressed concerns during a March 2025 Judicial Conference that the Trump administration might disregard federal court rulings, potentially leading to a constitutional crisis. This disclosure highlights an alleged judicial bias against President Trump's administration, despite the administration complying with court orders. Boasberg, appointed by former President Obama, has been central in multiple rulings against Trump’s policies on immigration and executive branch decisions, including blocking deportations and criticizing the use of the Alien Enemies Act. The judges’ discussion, including naming defendants in pending lawsuits, raised questions about the judiciary's impartiality and its disregard for the presumption that public officials properly perform their duties. This perceived bias extends to broader opposition within the judiciary against Trump’s agenda, such as border security and deportation efforts. These revelations have sparked significant debate about the role and neutrality of the federal judiciary in politically sensitive cases involving the Trump administration.