The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that anti-camping regulations penalizing homeless people for sleeping in public places do not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against 'cruel and unusual punishment.' This decision, stemming from the City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, has national implications as cities grapple with homelessness. While proponents like Attorney General Raul Labrador argue it helps maintain public safety, critics, including homeless advocates like Jodi Peterson Stigers, contend it criminalizes poverty and exacerbates homelessness. Local reactions vary; Portland, Oregon, has legislation requiring 'reasonable' camping laws, while Burien, Washington, faces criticism for prioritizing fines over supportive services. The ruling underscores a broader debate on the balance between public order and humane treatment of the homeless population.