High Court ruling sought on judge's immunity case

The High Court is preparing to issue a ruling on judicial immunity concerning Judge Salvatore Vasta, who was held liable for wrongly jailing a man during a divorce case. The judge's lawyers argue for immunity akin to that of superior court judges, while the plaintiff's attorneys contend that denying liability undermines victims' rights. In a separate legal development, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell criticized the Supreme Court's recent ruling on presidential immunity, stating it has hindered accountability for actions taken by presidents. Howell's ruling allows for the release of records related to Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago case, emphasizing that the immunity granted does not extend to those who assist in criminal acts. This has significant implications for transparency regarding presidential conduct. Howell’s decision suggests that while presidents may enjoy certain protections, the legal system does not absolve their associates from accountability for illegal actions.