DRC-Rwanda Peace Deal Signed Amid Ongoing Eastern Congo Violence, Justice Concerns

The recent US-brokered peace agreement signed between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda aims to end hostilities but has been widely criticized for failing to address justice or accountability for serious crimes committed, particularly by the Rwanda-backed M23 militia. Human rights organizations like Amnesty International highlight that the deal lacks provisions to investigate or hold perpetrators accountable, potentially perpetuating cycles of violence and civilian suffering in eastern DRC. Despite the ceasefire terms, clashes and abductions by armed groups, including M23 and Wazalendo, continue in the North and South Kivu provinces. Critics also note that the agreement does not explicitly call for the withdrawal of Rwandan troops from DRC or acknowledge Rwanda's military role, effectively glossing over Rwanda’s occupation and control in the region. Additionally, concerns exist about the exploitation of Congolese natural resources under the agreement, with some fearing economic interests may overshadow peace efforts. While President Donald Trump promotes the deal as beneficial for resource access, Congolese civilians and experts remain doubtful that it adequately addresses the root causes of conflict or ensures lasting security and justice.