The EPA is facing scrutiny after an internal watchdog revealed that top officials retaliated against three scientists for dissenting on risk assessments of new chemicals, violating the agency’s Scientific Integrity Policy and the Whistleblower Protection Act. The retaliation included downgrading performance ratings, withholding promotions, and reassignment, creating a hostile work environment where dissenting opinions were labeled as overly cautious. The watchdog's reports indicate that pressure to expedite chemical approvals resulted in altered assessments that downplayed potential health risks. The EPA has been criticized for a culture that punishes employees for raising concerns, with whistleblowers reportedly facing harassment for their views. While the current administration claims to prioritize scientific integrity, advocates argue that conditions for scientists have not improved significantly. The Center for Food Safety is also pushing for accountability regarding pesticide ingredient assessments, further highlighting environmental oversight issues.