Critics Warn Assisted Dying Bill Weakens Safeguards

The proposed Assisted Dying Bill, spearheaded by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, faces significant backlash after she suggested replacing the requirement for High Court approval with an expert panel to review applications. Critics argue that this change undermines the bill's original safeguards designed to protect vulnerable individuals, with some suggesting it reflects government pressure to streamline the judicial process. Leadbeater contends that involving a panel of psychiatrists and social workers will enhance the legislation's robustness, allowing for a more efficient review system. However, opponents, including members of her own party, have expressed concerns about the potential lack of transparency and accountability in the new process. The Law Society has also called for robust safeguards and legal aid provisions to ensure fair access to the system. As the bill progresses through the Commons, the debate over its safety and ethical implications intensifies.