Greenpeace Faces $670 Million Verdict Over Pipeline Protests

Greenpeace is facing a significant financial blow after a North Dakota jury ruled it liable for $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, stemming from its involvement in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016 and 2017. The verdict, which includes a substantial defamation award, has raised concerns among activist organizations and First Amendment advocates about the chilling effect it may have on free speech and activism. Critics argue that the lawsuit represents a dangerous use of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) designed to intimidate and silence dissent. Greenpeace maintains that it supported peaceful protests led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, while Energy Transfer claims the group orchestrated a harmful campaign against them. The case has sparked debate about the implications for organizations engaged in political activism, with legal experts warning that it could deter nonprofits from participating in protests. This situation highlights the ongoing conflict between corporate interests and environmental activism, with broader implications for democratic rights.