The United Nations has unanimously approved its first cybercrime treaty, which aims to enhance global cooperation in combating cybercrime but has raised significant concerns among human rights organizations and tech companies. The treaty, proposed by Russia and set for a vote in the General Assembly this fall, allows member states to request electronic evidence from other countries during criminal investigations, which critics argue could lead to increased surveillance and repression. Opponents contend that the treaty lacks sufficient safeguards to prevent misuse of digital investigation powers and could empower governments to censor expression under the guise of fighting cybercrime. Prominent critics, including the International Press Institute, warn that this treaty may facilitate greater state surveillance and undermine existing human rights protections. Meanwhile, the treaty is viewed by some as a way for authoritarian regimes to suppress dissent and control online discourse. These developments arrive against a backdrop of heightened scrutiny over the implications of cybercrime laws globally, highlighting the tension between security measures and civil liberties.