Scottish Couple Challenges UK's Winter Fuel Payment Cuts in Court

Peter and Florence Fanning from Coatbridge, Scotland, are challenging the UK and Scottish governments over the recent removal of universal Winter Fuel Payments for pensioners, a decision made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves. The couple, represented by former SNP MP Joanna Cherry, argues that both governments failed to consult adequately with pensioners and did not conduct an equality impact assessment prior to the cuts. They claim the decision is irrational and violates human rights, highlighting the financial strain it places on many older individuals who do not qualify for means-tested benefits. The Fannings seek to overturn this policy in the Court of Session, with Cherry pointing out that the changes have left around 9.2 million pensioners without crucial support during winter. The Scottish Government plans to implement a universal Winter Fuel Payment for its pensioners next winter, but the Fannings' case raises concerns about the adequacy of support in the interim. Both governments have declined to comment on the specifics of the ongoing legal case.