US Supreme Court Upholds Maryland Parents’ Religious Opt-Out Rights

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Mahmoud v. Taylor that Maryland parents with religious objections must be allowed to opt their children out of public school lessons featuring LGBTQ storybooks. The decision reversed lower court rulings and emphasized that forcing children to participate without parental consent imposes an unconstitutional burden on religious exercise, as stated by Justice Samuel Alito. The ruling criticized the Montgomery County school board for mandating the use of these books without prior parental notice and for rescinding an earlier opt-out policy. The court's majority opinion highlighted that the storybooks presented a particular pro-LGBTQ viewpoint that was actively reinforced by teachers, which goes beyond mere exposure to diverse ideas. Catholic bishops and religious groups praised the decision as a victory for parental rights and religious liberty, underscoring that parents have the primary role in guiding their children's education on faith and morals. Dissenting justices warned that the ruling could limit children's exposure to diverse perspectives in public schools, which is essential in a multicultural society.