In a heated parliamentary debate, independent MP Zali Steggall accused opposition leader Peter Dutton of racism for his stance against allowing Palestinians fleeing Gaza to enter Australia. Dutton's comments, suggesting a complete ban on Gaza refugees due to national security risks, have drawn criticism from government ministers and fellow MPs, who argue that his rhetoric is divisive and unfounded. Steggall defended her position, claiming her criticism of Dutton's language was not inflammatory but necessary to highlight the dangers of such divisive behavior. The controversy escalated as Dutton dismissed calls to provide evidence of any security threats posed by recent arrivals from Gaza. As tensions rise surrounding the ongoing conflict in Gaza, the debate reflects broader societal divisions within Australia regarding immigration and national security. This exchange underscores the contrasting perspectives on humanitarian obligations versus security concerns in the current political climate.