Biglaw-Trump Legal Deals Draw Growing Criticism, Risk Assessment

Several major law firms struck deals with the Trump administration to avoid or mitigate the impact of executive orders targeting Biglaw firms, pledging nearly $1 billion in pro bono work to conservative causes. Despite President Trump's public claims that these firms would be actively engaged by the administration, sources indicate that the firms have not received instructions or involvement requests from the White House regarding such pro bono efforts. These deals have sparked controversy, with some viewing them as a form of extortion and raising concerns about the firms' long-term reputations and legal scrutiny, especially if Democrats regain control of Congress. The risk environment for law firms has shifted from a 'hair on fire' crisis to a more cautious 'walking on eggshells' approach, reflecting ongoing uncertainty about Trump administration policies. The situation remains fluid and could become more complicated if the administration follows through on plans to utilize the firms. Overall, the interplay between the Trump administration and Biglaw raises questions about legal ethics, political influence, and the future of pro bono commitments.