Mexico's Supreme Court has dismissed a proposal to declare the upcoming election of judges unconstitutional, thereby supporting President Claudia Sheinbaum's controversial judicial reforms that allow voters to choose judges at all levels starting next year. This decision, made by eight out of eleven justices, has sparked protests and raised diplomatic tensions with the United States, which is concerned about the potential for political influence and corruption in the judiciary. Meanwhile, in Arizona, voters overwhelmingly rejected Proposition 137, which sought to eliminate term limits for some judges and limit retention elections, signaling a desire to maintain accountability within the state's judicial system. The Arizona measure had failed significantly with only 21.28% support. Critics of the Mexican reforms argue that elected judges may succumb to political pressures and threats from criminal organizations, while proponents claim the changes are essential for judicial accountability. This situation highlights ongoing debates about judicial independence and democratic reforms in both Mexico and the U.S.