Disgraced former BBC presenter Huw Edwards has received widespread condemnation for his six-month suspended sentence for possessing indecent images of children, including Category A images. Tory leadership candidate Tom Tugendhat has urged the Attorney General to review the sentence, arguing it is inconsistent with official guidelines and fails to deter such serious crimes. The Attorney General's office has stated that Edwards's case cannot be referred for appeal due to it being sentenced in a magistrates' court rather than a Crown court, leading to calls for reform of the leniency review process. Critics, including Reform UK's Richard Tice, have highlighted perceived disparities in sentencing, noting that some individuals received harsher penalties for less serious offenses. The outrage from the public and campaign groups underscores a demand for justice that adequately reflects the severity of child sex crimes. The debate continues as the government faces mounting pressure to reassess the sentencing framework.