Michael Madigan Corruption Trial Nears End as Defense Attacks Witness Credibility

The corruption trial of former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan and his co-defendant, lobbyist Michael McClain, is nearing its conclusion as both sides delivered closing arguments. McClain's attorney argued that the evidence presented was merely indicative of lobbying practices and emphasized the need for clear quid pro quo arrangements to prove bribery. Meanwhile, Madigan's defense focused on undermining the credibility of the government's key witness, former Chicago Alderman Danny Solis, labeling him as untrustworthy and self-serving. The prosecution contends that Madigan and McClain orchestrated a scheme involving no-work contracts for political favors benefiting utility companies. The jury is expected to begin deliberations following the government's rebuttal to McClain's defense. This trial represents a significant legal battle, especially following recent changes in the interpretation of federal bribery laws by the U.S. Supreme Court.