The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court is deliberating the anonymity requests of 28 high-profile individuals, including elected officials and professionals, implicated as clients of a high-end brothel network. Their attorneys argue that disclosing their identities could lead to significant personal and professional repercussions, while several media outlets assert the public's right to know, citing a substantial public interest in preventing preferential treatment for the powerful. The case emerged from a federal investigation that resulted in the arrests of three operators of the brothel, accused of running the operation from various upscale locations in Massachusetts and Virginia. During the hearings, justices expressed skepticism about the defendants’ privacy claims, suggesting that the public’s trust in the legal system must be maintained. The brothel allegedly operated under the guise of advertising nude modeling services, with clients reportedly paying between $350 and $600 for appointments. The court's decision on whether to keep the proceedings private could influence future legal standards regarding high-profile cases.