The death of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in an Israeli airstrike has sparked intense debate over how mainstream media portrayed him, often framing him as a 'charismatic' and 'fatherly' figure while glossing over his history of violence and terrorism. Various outlets, including The New York Times and Washington Post, faced criticism for romanticizing Nasrallah, with some obituaries highlighting his supposed dedication to 'resistance' without mentioning his responsibility for numerous attacks that killed Americans and Israelis. Israeli-Palestinian vlogger Nuseir Yassin, known as Nas Daily, expressed that Nasrallah was seen as a personal threat to many Israelis, likening him to Osama Bin Laden for Americans. Reactions on social media reflect strong sentiments against the media's portrayal of a man responsible for significant bloodshed, with critics arguing that journalistic integrity has eroded in covering figures like Nasrallah. Despite the media's laudatory coverage, many remember Nasrallah as a terrorist whose actions had severe consequences across the region. The contrasting responses highlight a broader discussion on the ethics of reporting on controversial figures in modern conflict.