A New York judge has ruled against the inclusion of the terms 'abortion' and 'LGBTQ' in the description of a proposed anti-discrimination amendment for the November ballot. Judge David A. Weinstein upheld the state Board of Elections' decision to use the proposal's original, technical language, asserting that it is not misleading and that predicting the amendment's impact is complex. The amendment aims to expand protections against discrimination to include ethnicity, national origin, age, disability, and gender-related aspects, but its implications for abortion rights remain uncertain. Democrats argue that clearer terminology would help voters understand the amendment's scope, while opponents welcome the more legalistic phrasing. Weinstein emphasized that the courts should not interpret the amendment's meaning before its enactment, leaving its future legal implications open-ended. Minor revisions to the ballot language were made to comply with state law requiring clarity in ballot measures.