Minnesota Court Requires Retreat in Self-Defense Cases
Minnesota Court Requires Retreat in Self-Defense Cases
Minnesota Court Requires Retreat in Self-Defense Cases
News summary

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in a 4-2 decision that individuals must retreat if 'reasonably possible' before using deadly force in self-defense, even when threatened. This ruling came from the case of Earley Romero Blevins, who brandished a machete at a light rail station in Minneapolis after being threatened with a knife. The court upheld his conviction for felony second-degree assault, stating that video evidence showed Blevins had ample opportunity to retreat. The decision has sparked debate, with dissenting justices calling it 'unprecedented' and 'inimical to both humanity and law.' Minnesota's ruling contrasts with the 'stand your ground' laws in at least 28 other states, which do not require retreat if the individual is lawfully present.

Story Coverage
Bias Distribution
67% Right
Information Sources
d387b58c-602b-49e7-8f0e-990aad2baa4737a048d0-d1c3-4045-a275-fea6b88183008f76b506-b4ea-4d97-9e25-107ba95ef15b
Left 33%
Right 67%
Coverage Details
Total News Sources
3
Left
1
Center
0
Right
2
Unrated
0
Last Updated
44 days ago
Bias Distribution
67% Right
Related News
Daily Index

Negative

20Serious

Neutral

Optimistic

Positive

Ask VT AI
Story Coverage

Related Topics

Subscribe

Stay in the know

Get the latest news, exclusive insights, and curated content delivered straight to your inbox.

Related News
Recommended News