The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the assignment of sand mining District Survey Reports (DSRs) preparation to private agencies, stating that concerns could be addressed through the National Green Tribunal. In a separate case, the Telangana High Court rejected a PIL against IAS officer Smita Sabharwal regarding her controversial remarks on the capabilities of differently-abled individuals in high-stakes professions, affirming her right to free speech. The court clarified that such personal opinions do not infringe upon the rights of the differently-abled population regarding reservation policies. Additionally, the Rajasthan High Court dismissed a PIL alleging encroachments on public land, noting that the matter was already under consideration by the relevant revenue authorities. The court emphasized that the petitioner should allow time for the authorities to investigate before seeking judicial intervention. These rulings highlight a trend of courts upholding individual rights while also ensuring proper procedural channels are utilized for public grievances.