Recent discussions highlight significant concerns about jury decision-making processes and the potential for wrongful convictions. Dr. Rebecca Helm's book, 'How Juries Work: And How They Could Work Better,' reveals that juries often rely on uninformed intuition, particularly in sensitive cases like sexual offenses, leading to biased outcomes. Additionally, the cases of Andrew Malkinson and Winston Trew underscore the risks associated with majority verdicts, which have contributed to wrongful convictions; both men were wrongly convicted by 10/2 votes. Advocates are calling for the reinstatement of unanimous verdicts, arguing that this change could prevent future injustices. Furthermore, the portrayal of juries in popular media, as evidenced by the film 'Runaway Jury,' raises questions about the effectiveness of legal representation and juror manipulation. Overall, there is a clear need for reevaluating legal procedures to enhance jury decision-making and address systemic biases within the justice system.